What makes SchemaReports different from other audit tools

SchemaReports uses real AI to read your content semantically, not a rule-based checklist. Every recommendation is written for your specific site. It also scores psychology, trust, and AI readiness, phases no other audit tool checks.

How much does SchemaReports cost

There's a free tier, one audit per month, no credit card required. Paid plans start at $19/month (Pro), $49/month (Multi-Business), $75/month (Prospector), and $99/month (Agency) with the GoHighLevel integration.

Are reports customizable with my branding?

Reports carry SchemaReports branding (gray label, not white label). This is intentional, third-party analysis is more credible than self-branded reports, and prospects can verify the findings themselves by running the same audit free.

How does the AI analysis work

Our system runs a 12-phase audit collecting over 1,000 data points. Our AI reads your content semantically, understanding what your business does and who it serves, and produces recommendations unique to your specific site.

What integrations do you support

SchemaReports integrates natively with GoHighLevel, every audit auto-creates a contact in your GHL account with audit data in custom values. Other CRMs supported via PDF, Markdown, and JSON export.

Does SchemaReports offer an API for integrations?

A public API is on the roadmap. Today, every audit exports as PDF, Markdown, and JSON for manual integration with your existing tools and workflows.

Core Web Vitals explained, in plain English.

LCP, INP, and CLS. These are the three numbers Google uses to rank your site on page experience. Here is what each one measures, what the targets are, and how to fix yours. INP replaced FID in March 2024.

Check Your Core Web Vitals See All 12 Phases

Core Web Vitals. LCP, INP, CLS explained

Why Google invented Core Web Vitals.

Before Core Web Vitals, Google measured site speed with a single number, page load time which did not reflect how sites actually feel to visitors. CWV replaced that with three specific metrics that measure real user experience: how fast does the main content appear (LCP), how fast does the page respond to a tap (INP), and does the layout shift around while loading (CLS).

LCP. Largest Contentful Paint, target under 2.5s
INP. Interaction to Next Paint, target under 200ms (replaced FID)
CLS. Cumulative Layout Shift, target under 0.1

Run Your Audit

Single website audit report showing 12-phase analysis results and recommendations

Largest Contentful Paint

How long until the main content shows. Target under 2.5s. Usually fixed by optimizing hero images and fonts.

Identifies which element is your LCP (often hero images or headings)
Measures load time on mobile and desktop separately
Recommends specific fixes like image compression or lazy loading

Check Your LCP

SchemaReports performance and technical SEO audit showing Core Web Vitals results

Interaction to Next Paint

How responsive your page is to taps and clicks. Target under 200ms. Usually a JavaScript problem. Replaced FID in March 2024.

Detects blocking JavaScript that delays interactivity
Measures response time for first user interaction
Suggests script optimization or deferral strategies

Test Interactivity

SchemaReports trust signals, psychology and ADA compliance audit results

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much your layout jumps around while loading. Target under 0.1. Usually caused by unoptimized images, ads, or web fonts.

Identifies elements causing layout shifts (ads, images, fonts)
Calculates total shift score across page load
Recommends size attributes for images and reserved space for dynamic content

Check Layout Stability

Fix LCP

Optimize your hero image (compress, serve WebP, correct dimensions), preload critical fonts, remove render-blocking JavaScript.

Convert to WebP or AVIF format for better compression
Use srcset for responsive images that load appropriate sizes
Lazy load below-the-fold images to prioritize LCP element

Fix INP

Reduce JavaScript bundle size, defer non-critical scripts, break up long-running tasks, lazy-load third-party widgets.

Defer non-critical scripts with async or defer attributes
Move third-party scripts to load after page becomes interactive
Consider removing unused plugins and widgets

Fix CLS

Set explicit width and height on images and ads, avoid inserting content above existing content, use font-display: swap carefully.

Add explicit width and height attributes to all images
Reserve space for dynamic content like ads with min-height CSS
Use font-display: swap to prevent layout shift from web fonts

What FID was, and why it is gone

FID measured only the delay to a first click. INP measures all interactions throughout the page lifetime. INP is a better metric. Google made the switch in March 2024.

Enable caching to serve repeated requests from memory
Use a CDN to serve static assets from edge locations
Optimize database queries and consider better hosting

Find Your Issues

How SchemaReports measures Core Web Vitals.

SchemaReports fetches your live page in a browser context and measures LCP, INP, and CLS the same way Chrome does for real users. Not simulated. Not cached. Real values on the live site. Every slow element is identified by selector. Phase 1 of every audit, free or paid.

Live measurement, not simulation
Element-level identification
Specific fix recommendations

Test Mobile Performance

How SchemaReports measures Core Web Vitals live

Core Web Vitals, common questions

Common questions about Google's performance metrics and how we measure them.

Do Core Web Vitals actually affect rankings?

Yes, they are a confirmed Google ranking signal as part of the page experience update.

Same measurement tools Google uses for ranking decisions
Both mobile and desktop scores analyzed separately

What is a good score?

Under 2.5s LCP, under 200ms INP, under 0.1 CLS.

Good scores give you a ranking advantage in competitive searches
Poor scores can push you down even if your content is solid

What happened to FID?

Retired in March 2024 and replaced by INP. INP is a better metric because it measures the entire page lifetime.

Scores can change when you update plugins or add new content
Regular tracking shows if your improvements actually worked

Why is TBT not a Core Web Vital?

TBT is a lab metric (measured during development). INP is a field metric (measured from real users). Google ranks on field metrics.

Most impact in competitive industries where content quality is similar
Better performance also means better user experience and conversions

Can I use Lighthouse instead?

Lighthouse runs a lab version of the check. SchemaReports runs the live version. Both are useful, live is more accurate.

Field data shows real-world performance across different devices and connections
Lab data provides consistent testing for tracking improvements over time

Can I pass Core Web Vitals with a WordPress site?

Yes, but it requires attention to plugins, themes, and hosting. WordPress sites often struggle with Core Web Vitals because of plugin bloat and cheap hosting. Use caching plugins, optimize images, and choose a fast theme.

Audit your plugins and remove ones you don't actually need
Better hosting makes a bigger difference than any optimization plugin

Run Free Audit

Check Your Site

Find out where your Core Web Vitals actually stand.

10,000+ sites have already been audited. See what's holding yours back, 12 phases, 1,000+ data points, AI-powered analysis. Completely free.

The only audit that checks Psychology, Trust, and AI Readiness
12 phases, 1,000+ data points, results in under 5 minutes
Free to run, free to download, yours to keep forever

Run Free Audit (480) 750-1665

Find out where your Core Web Vitals stand